Quotes and Relevance:
"If creativity is not inherent in human mental powers and is, in fact, social and situational, then technological developments may well be linked to advances in the creativity of individual users.'
(Banaji, Burn & Buckingham - 2006)
This point could be argued against to some extent as some may be born with a significantly better creative ability that derives from biological and genetic background. However, I would personally agree with this statement, as social and environmental elements will always have an impact on a persons ability to successfully produce a creative product to a certain extent. For example, the cost of certain technologically advanced software may mean that some people have limits placed on their potential. What is available to an individual user, from a research point of view, may also be limited and may therefore restrict their creative abilities. All of these things show that technology very much has an impact on the creative ability.
"Creativity results from the interaction of a system composed of three elements: a culture that contains symbolic rules, a person who brings novelty into the symbolic domain, and a field of experts who recognise and validate the innovation."
(Csikszentmihalyi - 1996)
Again, this point may be argued against as an individual user, with the use of technologically advanced software and equipment, can quite easily produce a media product themselves. However, outside opinion and feedback from others, especially experts, can prove to be extremely valuable within the editing and further improvements stages. Also, bringing 'novelty into the symbolic domain' refers to the idea of understanding, conforming to and challenging media conventions.